Knorr-Bremse
39 Employer Review(s)
Colleagues:
Supervisor:
Tasks:
Salary:
Career:
OVERALL:
Location
#
Country
Date
Rating
Review
Aldersbach 1
11.05.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Aldersbach 2
12.09.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Need to improve personnel management. Filling employment. Reasonable job provider.
Berlin 3
11.07.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Berlin 4
09.06.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Berlin 5
17.03.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Berlin 6
06.11.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 7
15.12.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 8
28.03.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 9
17.07.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 10
07.05.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 11
25.10.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 12
06.09.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 13
06.01.2020
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 14
25.11.2020
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 15
06.10.2020
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 16
26.06.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Germany 17
06.06.2023
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 18
09.11.2023
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 19
15.12.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 20
26.01.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Satisfactory employment site.
Munich 21
19.03.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Munich 22
01.12.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Munich 23
24.01.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Munich 24
14.02.2022
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Munich 25
25.06.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Fair payments. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Munich 26
29.05.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Munich 27
06.03.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Satisfactory staff work. Interesting tasks. Excellent employer.
Munich 28
23.10.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Interesting tasks. Recommendable workplace.
Munich 29
25.05.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Munich 30
23.06.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Munich 31
03.03.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Munich 32
01.03.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Useful management. No filling operation. Fair payments. Average recognition. Employers with criticisms.
Munich 33
16.08.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Fair payments. Beneficial career. Employers with criticisms.
Munich 34
06.10.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Munich 35
27.02.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Munich 36
19.08.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Munich 37
05.10.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Demotivating income. Beneficial career. Reasonable job provider.
Munchen 38
24.01.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Schwieberdingen 39
14.10.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
